Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 7 results ...

Chan, D W M, Hung, H T W, Chan, A P C and Lo, T K K (2014) Overview of the development and implementation of the mandatory building inspection scheme (MBIS) in Hong Kong. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 4(01), 71-89.

Kurniawan, F, Ogunlana, S and Motawa, I (2014) Stakeholders’ expectations in utilising financial models for public-private partnership projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 4(01), 4-21.

Leung, M-Y and Yu, J (2014) Value methodology in public engagement for construction development projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 4(01), 55-70.

Opoku, A and Ahmed, V (2014) Embracing sustainability practices in UK construction organizations: Challenges facing intra-organizational leadership. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 4(01), 90-107.

Osman, H and Nikbakht, M (2014) A game-theoretic model for roadway performance management: A socio-technical approach. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 4(01), 40-54.

Thomson, C and El-Haram, M (2014) Potential and implications of sustainability action plans: Lessons from the Greater Middlehaven Regeneration Project. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 4(01), 108-22.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Assessment; Case studies; Project management; Sustainability
  • ISBN/ISSN: 2044-124X
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-11-2012-0053
  • Abstract:
    Purpose – Sustainability action plans are emerging as a management tool to facilitate the delivery of sustainability objectives which are planned, measured and achievable in practice. The purpose of this paper is to explore the potential to support an integrated approach to delivering sustainability across the phases of a construction project. A holistic approach to sustainability is promoted which aims to be understandable, managed and aligned with available sustainability assessment methods. Design/methodology/approach – The application of a sustainability action plan is explored in the Greater Middlehaven Regeneration Project (UK). Six key stakeholders were interviewed to consider the rational of its application, structure, role of sustainability assessment and contribution to project development and delivery. Two workshops involving practitioners and experts in sustainable construction explored the implications for the wider context. Findings – A framework around which sustainability can be managed through a series of integrated tailored action plans applied across each project phase was highlighted. Clear benefits were presented in facilitating the sharing of knowledge, communicating aspirations and in providing leadership to project members. Research limitations/implications – The case study enjoys a supportive environment to embed best practice and thus full appreciation of potential barriers to implementation in other contexts was not possible. Practical implications – The research illustrates the need to promote a common sustainability legacy across the project phases and highlights the role of a sustainability action plan in facilitating this consistency. Originality/value – A holistic approach founded on an understandable philosophy remains innovative in practice and explored are its value and implications.

Vanelslander, T, Chomat, G, Roumboutsos, A and Bonnet, G (2014) Cross-sectoral comparison of concessions in transport: Urban, road and port pre-fuzzy assessment. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 4(01), 22-39.